Sunday, May 11, 2008

Borglum's Sheridan


I've always admired this piece,
though usually,
I can only give it a glance
while turning onto Belmont
from Lake Shore Drive.

What a contrast with the elegant, severe
St. Gaudens' equestrian in Grant Park.




This one is more earthy,
fleshy, and
dynamic


From what I've seen so far,
it's my favorite American equestrian,
and my favorite Borglum -
and an improvement over his
earlier version for Washington D.C.


Gutzon Borglum did the piece when he was 55 - about
five years before starting Mt. Rushmore.














Unfortunately,
the piece is surrounded by some
of the ugliest architecture
Chicago has to offer.

National Elks Memorial - Chicago



Finally got over to the Elk's Memorial this weekend,
it's been nearly 30 years since I saw it last.

The problem being --

I just didn't like it.
It felt dark, heavy, and depressing to me.

But I have been getting more interested in cemeteries lately,
so I thought I'd give it another try.

And I'm afraid
I still don't like it.

But I am kind of interested in the program of murals
that Eugene Savage did up near the ceiling.

They're a bit hallucinogenic.

Unfortunately -- they're also very high and not well lit,
but with the wonders of a high exposure on the camera,
and a bit of photoshop manipulation,
they do look rather exciting.








What would you call such a style?

Byzantine Mannerist?

How do you design something
for such a dark and high location?

To tell a story, it needs to show strong contour lines
with heavy stylization so the action
could be seen from the floor.


It's a shame they couldn't afford mosaic,
where the reflective surface could have
captured whatever light was available.
(which is what the Byzantines used
on those high, dark ceilings)

So ... yes... it's kind of goofy and fun... but...
sad compared with the great Byzantine churches








And I am so glad that Savage
went for the fanciful instead of the sedate.

He would have qualified as a
Viennese Secessionist.







It was really tough to take good photos
in this dark place -- a real challenge to
my image stabilization chip.

But I don't think I did that much worse
than these images from the Elks' own website
that don't really give a feeling for the paintings on-site.




I'm less enthusiastic about the program
of sculpture.





A.A. Weinman was a leading American
public sculptor of his day,
but I've kept him off my sculpture site
because the place for good illustration
is in magazines -- not on buildings.





Even more disappointing
were the pieces by James Earle Fraser
inside the rotunda.

What distinguishes a theme park
from a sacred space?

I'm afraid that Americans
have never quite figured that out.







I'm more interested
in this heavy, convoluted piece
by Fraser's wife, Laura Gardin Fraser.

I find it repulsive,
but at least it's not banal.

**********

So ... it might be another 30 years before I return.
(except -- I want to see Savage's paintings in the library,
which will re-open in July)


And I suppose a place like this
shows why America dropped the figurative
entirely out of art and architecture
in the later decades of the 20th C.

We failed.

Sunday, May 04, 2008

Artopolis 2008 - Paintings

Ernest Albert (1857-1946)American



The empty - the full,
the mystery of the orient,
working the same territory
as Hovsep Pushman



Harald Pryn (1891-1968) Denmark


Something about this recent winter in Chicago,
so thoroughly documented here
made me especially interested
in snow scenes from around the world.

There's something so prim and proper
about this Danish landscape.
Just a little too civilized






Robert C. Breer (b. 1926)

A fun, artsy fellow
who's best known for his short
films

... but I really like his geo-form designs as well.
(it would make a great jazz album cover)




Maurice Menardeau (1897-1977)

I feel like I'm in this room -
I'm ready to look at the paintings -
and then plop down on the sofa



Preston Dickenson (1889-1930)


Nothing like a fun day in the park
(with possibly some
psychedelics involved)



Enrique Santana

One of my favorite Chicago painters
(and our glass box architects
should love him too)





Enrique Santana


I've seen this Chicago Tribune facility
dozens of times.

But I never thought it could look this good.



Raphael Soyer (1899-1987)


I am such a fan of this man's drawings,
and now his paintings as well.


Don't you know these people?
(well -- maybe you have to be Jewish)

(and the detail areas are delicious)



Jeremy Long

An up and coming Chicago painter,
this painting is H*U*G*E
(maybe -- 15 feet long?)

O.K. -- maybe the self reference
gets just a bit tiring
(it seems like all of his paintings are
both huge - and about himself and family)

But Rembrandt did a lot of self portraits, too
didn't he?

Here's a
gallery
of his work.




John Hartman


is a Canadian painter
who paints cities
like Soutine painted a rotting carcass.

Above is London



John Hartman

and here's my adopted city, Chicago.
It feels a bit predatory doesn't it ?

Like some kind of voracious sea creature.



Jule Rene Herve (1887-1981)

So many good painters and sculptors from
that generation




Kees Van Dongen (1877-1968)


A modern Mona Lisa,
what message is she sending
with that blinking eye of hers?



Francis Chapin (1899-1965)

A leading Chicago painter
of his day.

(and that's how the city
still feels to me)




George Charles Robin (France, 20th C.)


The kind of painting I want to move into
and stay for a few days
when the rest of the world
feels a bit too burdensome.



Hashiguchi Goyo (1881-1921)

A dedicated student of the genre,
He died tragically young,
completing only 14 prints.

But - yes -- he is worthy
to be placed beside his hero -
the great Utamaro.





Hans Hofmann (1880-1966)


I hate ABX,
but like Hans Hofmann.

He's fun.

Does this mean I'm as neurotic as Jackson Pollock?



Andy Pankhurst, b.1968


It's just a wall, a door,
and a few twigs,
but I enjoyed it.



Andy Pankhurst


He's makes painting
a nude figure seem easy,
by mostly ignoring the nude.
A good strategy!






Every year
the antiques fair
shows an engaging
painting by an unknown painter.
No name - no date - no nothing.

The poor devil has been totally lost to history.

Except that this brief flicker of his vision
lives on.


Charles Warren Eaton (1857-1937)


What a delightful little romp through space.
Are Cezanne landscapes any better?



Eugene Laloue 1854-1941

Another one of those scenes
where I hear the people talking
and smell the smoke from a kitchen stove.




Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Artopolis 2008 - The Sculpture

What was this thing made for?

It would seem so perfect for a hotel lounge -
or anywhere travelers can be found.

And what's with those strange, fat dreadlocks?
Was Manzu just goofing around with rolls of clay
and -- whoops -- that looks good--- let's keep it ??



I find it so thrilling





even in the details.
It's got:
"the force that through the green fuse
drives the flower"






I'm less excited
about Antonucci Volti ,
but still, I'm glad I've finally seen a piece
in real space.

This is my kind of thing:
heavy female body,
kind of mythic,
kind of dreamy.

But it lacks that spark.





Masahiko Hatori (1899 - 1988)


Every year,
the Antiques Fair has a dealer
in 20th C. Japanese collectables,
giving us the chance to admire
those clean, fresh lines of Japanese design.

This piece is both strong and cute,
not an obvious combination.




Hakuro (1926-1989)

More from the Japanese booth.
Doesn't his antelope seem fashionable?

These are not ordinary beasts--
but seem to be the pets of
some kind of sacred grove.








I think this is Franz Klimsch , though I'm not sure.

Whatever it is,
it's still the official style
of the Third Reich






There seems to be an endless supply
of great ceramics from the Tang Dynasty.

Why is that period so good?






and, of course,
more Tang women.

The proportions of her
hair-head-torso-legs
just seem so perfect





In my last 10 years
of going to these shows,
Nicholas Africano
seems to be the only sculptor,
local or otherwise,
who can sell a straight-ahead figure.

Casting them in glass is kind of risky,
many pieces are disappointing,
but when it hits,
the occasional translucency
makes it's delightful.

And what upscale home
wouldn't want to have
such an elegant but wayward son?

It appears that he got a little drunk
and fell in the pool.








Is this the same Armando Romero who's known for his cartoonish paintings?

I can't tell -- nor can I imagine why anyone who put the effort into carving this
marble figure would dump a cup of yellow paint over it.

But the results are certainly striking.
(and it reminds me of this Chinese figure with the dripping green paint.)

Maybe figure statues need to be painted
like glazed ceramic pots
to keep them from being seen
as toy action figures.





Sunday, April 27, 2008

Artopolis 2008 - The Drawings





Giacomo Manzu (1908-1991)


Here are my favorite drawings from the show,
and I guess it's no surprise
that the people who drew them
were born around a hundred years ago.

The above is a very large drawing,
by a very great sculptor,
and it made me shout when I saw it.







Georg Kolbe (?)







Max Beckmann (1884-1950)

Rather explicit,
but can sex between old people
ever be pornographic?

It's
more like endearing.



Hong Purme

I found very little Asian brush painting
in this show
(apparently there was a gallery of it,
but I missed it)


I sure liked the work of this
young Korean woman, though.






Hong Purume


even down to the detail areas,
everything feels majestic - cosmic.


More of her work
can be found
here



Wilhelm Lehmbruck (1881-1918)


Here's another great sculptor.


I've never seen his drawings before,
but I think I've been trying to imitate his style
for many years.








Artopolis 2008 - The Cincinnati Painters

Robert Herrmann (1922-1966)



The Artopolis shows at the Chicago Merchandise Mart
are getting larger -- as they are also getting worse.

Which meant, for me,
that I had to walk more
to find less.

But one of my happy moments was
the Cincinnati Art Galleries booth,
which introduced me to three
hometown painters
I'd never seen before.

I especially enjoyed these
urban landscapes by Robert Herrmann.

And I like his story.

He got a degree in Art History
(about the time I was born)
and wrote a dissertation on
Charles Demuth
but then, instead of
spending his life writing about art,
he spent his life making it

(or, actually, he only spent weekends painting,
and there doesn't seem to be any information
about his work-a-day career)

When he died, his sister took
a few paintings to a dealer,
and now, like Eva Cassidy
in the world of music,
he's had a distinguished posthumous career.







I'm sure that every American city
offers these kinds of views,
but these paintings feel
just like
Cincinnati to me,
a city big enough to really be urban,
and small enough to feel quaint.

(With that bright, clean
Teutonic sense of order
also found in Milwaukee)




Dixie Selden

seems to have been a swinging young Cincy socialite
who traveled around the world
making paintings a hundred years ago.

Above is a view of Tokyo.










Louis Vogt

(along with Dixie,
was also a student of Cincinnati's art hero,
Frank Duveneck.)


My This Old Palette
project has gotten me immersed
in Chicago painting c. 1900-1940,
but I'm kind of liking these Cincinnati painters a bit more.


They seem to have a lighter touch.








Sunday, April 20, 2008

General Logan in Grant Park



How did I manage to miss this great equestrian
by America's greatest public sculptor
in Grant Park?

The sculptor is Augustus Saint Gaudens (1848-1907)
and the piece was completed in 1897

(note: the gentlemen in the foreground
were recording a reminiscence of
their glory days during the protests
and riot that accompanied the
1968 Democratic Convention )




Wow -- what a statue,
really a picture of masculine vigor
as imagined in
1895 America.



It's a bit cartoonish,
sacrificing everything for dramatic effect --
but what an effect !



and it makes for so many
dramatic views




dramatic views from all sides






John A. Logan
was the most celebrated
citizen soldier from that era.
(he became an officer -- because he recruited a company
from his home town)





Could it get any more dramatic?


















and it's strong in the details, too

Saint-Gaudens
did not know how to make a weak shape,
everything is coiled like a spring.


(and how sad that contemporary
military leaders cannot be presented
on a horse)




Shinjo Ito




A chance encounter
with a half-page ad
in the Chicago Tribune

led me to this exhibit

in an upscale private exhibition hall
about a mile south of the Chicago Loop
(a perfect location, BTW, for art exhibits
that don't get accepted into
the public venues)






and why wasn't his exhibit
held at the Art Institute of Chicago
or the Cultural Center
or the Field Museum?

Why is religious art
only acceptable to these institutions
if it's hundreds of years old ?

************

But getting back to this exhibit...

These small, seated, Bodhisattvas
were the kind of pieces I liked the most,
and would compare nicely
with the hundreds on display
in the Tibetan room at the Field Museum.





This was my favorite standing figure,
but once
he made the poses more complicated
or the pieces larger,
he lost me.

The large pieces get cartoonish,
and the really large piece,
his Parinirvana ,
looks like a float
in a Mardi Gras parade.



"I am no professional, So when I think about it, I feel uneasy as to how much of the loving kindness, compassion, and virtue of the Buddha the images I create with my amateur skills can express. But I do pour my soul into the job, with sincere heart, as if offering three bows for every cut of the chisel. The only thing clearly showing in my work may be that."
- Shinjo Ito (1906-1989)



And no -- he was not a sculptor
so much as an aeronautical engineer
who founded a religious order,
Shinnyo-En ,
in 1936

(and BTW -- this is where
Wikipedia really shines,
because it's the most accessible
location on the web to find information
about a contemporary religious sect
that hasn't been presented
by itself





Here's the leader himself,
enthroned in a nice cushy chair





And here's his wife,
who was also a spiritual leader of group
in life as well as death





And here's one of their children
who died young,
but still communicates
with initiates
from his home in a distant paradise.



All of which is,
of course,
more important to followers of the sect
than it is to artsy types like myself,
for whom all these liturgical
but self-referential details
are as goofy as anything
found in museums of contemporary art.
(so why wouldn't the MCA host the exhibit?)



But
what really bothers me,
is why Shinjo Ito
didn't hire some real sculptors.

Not everyone is born to found a religious order --
but, neither, is everyone born to
to design magnificent sculpture
like the ones in Nara








But like many Asian gentlemen
Shinjo Ito had quite a hand for calligraphy
and I really enjoyed his
"Eternal is the Dharma Stream"






Sunday, April 06, 2008

Getting close to Hopper


Amazingly coincident
with the exhaustive exhibit
of Winslow Homer at the Art Institute

is this exhausting exhibit of Edward Hopper
encouraging the intrepid viewer
to see both in one day
and speculate on comparisons

And first, we can notice
that Hopper liked trains
while Homer liked boats.

(the above was done early in his life
and it's so lively-
and isn't travel especially exciting
when you haven't done much yet?)



another early painting.
Those calligraphic yellow stripes
are so enjoyable -- they feel like
they're the last marks he made on the canvas.

And the whole setting has a feeling of excitement.
She's not alone in this room,
and this is another kind of trip
that still feels new to him











Looking into the neighbor's windows.

Should we really be doing this ?







Another nude woman in a bedroom,
but this time she's alone,
really alone,
and I remember staring out
the early morning windows of Manhattan,
wondering what kind of day will happen
in that big bustling city







I also recall this kind of scene,
of getting to the auditorium early,
and sharing those moments of utter boredom
that precede even the best performances.

(and look, up close, at that guys eyes,
they're solid black - like the demons
in a certain genre of contemporary television )






This was my favorite painting in the show,
I suppose because I too
have stared with wonder at this island in the middle
of the East River -- so dark, quiet and imposing.
A place that I'm sure is more enjoyable to look at
than to be in.
(certainly - back in Hopper's day
when Blackwell's Island had some kind of
penitentiary on it.)

This is a large painting,
and the blue swirls in the foreground
are very delightful





I like Hopper more when takes us outside
to stand in the sun,
and these jpgs do no justice
to the lively excitement of the actual paintings.

He did a whole series of light houses,
and Captain Upton's was my favorite.


Here's another of my favorite house paintings.
Maybe they're kind of forbidding from a distance,
but as you stand very close,
there's a delightful attention to the detail,
not of boards and windows,
but of paint -- applied thick or applied thin,
ever so carefully
wherever it's applied






The interior scenes all seem a bit creepy to me,
and who would ever paint their apartments green ?

And why is Hopper still looking into people's windows?

But yes -- this is a wonderful vignette







I'm much happier when Hopper takes us outside,
and here I have to guess
that he's remembering Homer's paintings
of the Bahamas.
(and maybe Turner, too)





And I love to go on the road with him.
(when have telephone poles ever looked so good?)





Apparently Hopper loved to drive around the country,
from coast to coast,
and I'm glad he's taken us along.

(and again --when you get up real close
the surface is delicious)





Here he is ...
a fine American man,
looking you straight in the eye.

But there's not much time to talk,
he's got to get back in his car
and head down the road.

**************

Whoops, I almost forgot to compare him to Winslow Homer.

They're certainly both the poets of loneliness, aren't they ?

But Homer liked to seek it out in the lonely places
out in the wilds,
while Hopper found it right next door in the big city.

And though Homer just seemed to get better and better
as he got older --all obsessed with painting as he was,
Hopper seems to have peaked just as he was getting famous
around 1940,
and after that he kept looking for the creepy/edgy
and finding it too.

(he probably needed to forget about the museums,
galleries and critics --
and just head off to the mountain streams and distant shores
like Homer did.)





Saturday, April 05, 2008

A Sculptor's statement

"Tragedy of Man"

Malvin Marr Albright (Zsissly)
was the son of Adam Emory Albright ,
a well known Chicago painter ,
and the twin brother of Ivan Albright
an even better known painter
who is on permanent display
at the A.I.C.


But poor Malvin,
who remembers him ?

The above statue was featured in the 1933
survey of modern art in Chicago
entitled "Art of Today"

...and here's the artist's statement
that accompanied the above photo:




I am a sculptor. I have been raised on art, have always been surrounded with it, good or bad, and naturally might be supposed to take a lot of it for granted. When I think of art seriously which I do, occasionally, it broadens out into what might be called a philosophy of life. What little kick I get out of sculpture -not much - I get out of my study of things and nature rather than out of what I make in clay or stone. What one is able to make is so insignificant that it doesn't much matter whether it is good or bad, because relatively it is always very bad. Technique in sculpture means nothing to me. It is a result and of no importance as a thing to be striven for. I think the greatest thing in art is nothing; therefore if you can make something look like nothing and still be something you will have done what no one has succeeded in doing as yet. It resolves itself into a matter of thought. A sculptor's work can never be greater than his thoughts, no matter how well his hands and eyes may be trained. The great trouble today is that the sculptors do not think. And the very few exceptions among them who do do a little thinking are so unskilled as workmen with their hands that their thinking doesn't do them much good. In other words, the sculptors of today have nothing to say and they say it poorly.

I do not consider my art an expression of the age. The age has nothing to do with it. As to whether my art is American or Chicagoan: what pray tell me, have those terms to do with the muscles in a man's stomach ? A man may be a Jew from Jerusalem or a Negro from Africa or a Frenchman from Paris, but if his work is Jewish in spirit or Negro or French it is nothing -it is small and narrow and very limited. The only spirit worth striving towards is the spirit of God, the spirit of the universe, the spirit of truth. And this is to be found by observing nature in her infinite yet harmonious forms,not by aping your incoherent human beings.

When I get tired of sculpture and need a rest I paint. I think sculptors when they have nothing of importance to do should paint.




If the "the spirit of truth --- is to be found by observing nature"
... then why look at sculpture ?


and how can "Technique in sculpture means nothing to me."
... if there are sculptors who are "so unskilled.. their
thinking doesn't do them much good"

Malvin's art theory seems to have been quite advanced
for his time
.. or maybe he's just symptomatic of his own diagnosis:

"The great trouble today is that sculptors do not think"


But I like his above sculpture,

(much more than the paintings of his father or famous brother)

though I would rename this piece:

"Oy Vey iz Mir"

(though he didn't want to be known as a Jewish sculptor)